The Recorded Lesson as an Evaluative Device
A Meta-Evaluation of the Rubrics of Module 2 in the Chilean Teacher Evaluation System
Abstract
This study examines the rubrics used in Module 2 (recorded lesson) of the Chilean Teacher Performance Evaluation System from an evaluative perspective. The aim is to analyze their internal coherence, degree of observability, and formative potential in order to understand the underlying conception of teaching and “good classroom practice” that they promote. The research adopts a qualitative approach, using an evaluative documentary analysis design oriented toward the meta-evaluation of assessment instruments. No human participants were involved. The empirical corpus consisted of the official Module 2 rubrics applied to grades 7 through 12, including performance indicators, level descriptors, and accompanying explanatory notes.
Data were analyzed through an evaluative matrix built around three analytical criteria: internal coherence, observability of descriptors, and formative potential. The findings indicate that, while the rubrics show a generally consistent structural organization, there are notable differences in how performance progressions are constructed across indicators. In several cases, progressions rely primarily on quantitative or frequency-based distinctions, which limits the explicit articulation of qualitative changes in teaching practice. Additionally, the results reveal heterogeneous levels of observability, with some descriptors requiring substantial inferential judgment, as well as uneven formative potential across indicators.
Overall, the study highlights tensions between the formative orientation declared by Chilean teacher evaluation policy and the concrete evaluative design of the Module 2 rubrics. These findings provide relevant insights for revising teacher evaluation instruments and strengthening their capacity to support professional learning.
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Centro de Perfeccionamiento, Experimentación e Investigaciones Pedagógicas (CPEIP). (2025). Rúbricas del Módulo 2: Clase grabada. Evaluación del desempeño profesional docente. Ministerio de Educación de Chile.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. Teachers College Press.
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile (MINEDUC). (2023). Sistema de evaluación del desempeño profesional docente. https://www.docentemas.cl
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
