The work with logical fallacies and its influence on the development of analytical thinking in high school students

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31644/mfarchere_v.9;n.27/26-A02
Keywords: Fallacies, Logic, Analytical Thinking, Critical Thinking

Abstract

This work analyzes how the study and practice of analyzing logical fallacies can strengthen analytical thinking in high school students, focusing on its impact on the identification of reasoning errors, critical judgment and the construction of solid arguments. The importance of integrating logic into the educational curriculum is highlighted, to overcome traditional approaches focused on memorization and move towards methodologies that develop higher cognitive skills. The research was carried out with 106 high school students, using a survey and evaluations to measure the level of understanding about logical fallacies and analytical thinking. The results show limited knowledge of fallacies, but significant interest in critical analysis, although areas for improvement persist. It is concluded that working with logical fallacies not only improves academic performance, but also prepares students to face social, ethical and professional challenges, promoting a more critical and reflective citizenship. This approach helps reduce uncritical acceptance of information and encourages active participation in debates. There is a call to reform educational approaches to integrate logic as a key tool in the comprehensive development of students.

Author Biography

Carlos Alejandro Largo Chacón, Universidad Nacional de Educación

Carlos Alejandro Largo Chacón holds a Bachelor’s degree in Philosophy and Pedagogy from the Salesian Polytechnic University of Ecuador. He is currently pursuing a degree in Inclusive Education at the National University of Education (UNAE) and is a master’s degree candidate in Neuroeducation at the Salesian Polytechnic University.
He works as a Language and Literature teacher at the Private Baptist Educational Unit Charles Spurgeon. His research interests focus on Philosophy for Children, logical fallacies, logic, and artificial intelligence applied to education, aiming to strengthen teaching and learning processes through a critical, reflective, and innovative approach.

 

References

Abbagnano, N. (1993). Diccionario de Filosofía. México: Fondo de Cultura Economica.

Al-Abdullatif, A., & Alsaeed, M. (2019). Evaluating visible learning: Mathematics teachers’ practices in technology-enhanced classrooms. Congent Education, 1-24.

Bordes Solanas, M. (2011). Las trampas de Circe: Falacias lógicas y argumentación informal . Madrid: Cátedra.

Cardenas-Marín, W., Reyes, D., & Viteri, F. (2017). La formalización lógica del lenguaje como punto de partida para el analísis objetivo del discurso y la argumentación científica. En F. Aguilar, Sophia Colección de Filsoofía de la Educación (Filosofía Analítica y Educación) (págs. 103-125). Quito: ABYA YALA.

Chaffee, J. (2017). Thinking Critically. Boston: Cengage Learning.

Copi, I. (2001). Lógica Simbólica. México: Compañía Editorial Continental, S.A. de C.V.

Copi, I., & Cohen, C. (2013). Introducción a la lógica. México: limusa.

Dewey, J. (2007). Cómo Pensamos (La relación entre pensamiento reflexivo y proceso educativo). Barcelona : Paidós.

Ferrater Mora, J., & Leblanc, H. (1955). Lógica Matemática . México: FONDO DE CULTURA ECONOMICA.

Freire, P. (2005). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogía del Oprimido. México: Siglo XXI.

Fyfe, E., McNeil, N., Son, J., & Goldstone, R. (2015). Concreteness Fading in Mathematics and Science Instruction: a Systematic Review. Springer, 6-25.

Gardner, H. (1997). Arte, Mente y Cerebro. Buenos Aires : Paidós.

Glock, H.-J. (2012). ¿Qué es la Filosofía Analítica? Madrid : Editorial Técnos.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (1997). Metodología de la Investigación . Bogotá: McGraw - Hill Interamericana de México, S.A. de C.V.

Jasso, J., Conforti, C., & Jasso, E. (2020). Lógica(s) argumentación y pensamiento crítico (Didáctica, Problemas y Discusiones. México, D.F.: Editorial Torres Asociados .

Kaminski, J., Sloutsky, V., & Heckler, A. (2009). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 454-455.

Lipman, M. (2016). El lugar del pensamiento en la educación . Barcelo: Octaedro Editorial.

Ministerio de Educación. (22). Currículo de los niveles de educación obligatoria. Quito: Ministerio de Educación.

Moore, G. (1983). Defensa del sentido común y otros ensayos . Barcelona : Ediciones ORBIS S. A.

Mora, R. (2020). Para comprender a las falacias . Lima: ACUEDI Ediciones.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Socratic Questioning ( Based on Critical Thinking Concepts & Tools). United States of America: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Roblero Balbuena, A. K. (2024). El pensamiento desde la lógica y la neuropsicología: Formalismo, Funciones Ejecutivas y Memoria Semántica. Miscelánea Filosófica αρχή Revista Electrónica, 1-34.

Soames, S. (2019). El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica (Frege, Moore, Russell y Wittgenstein). España: Tecnos.

von Savigny, E. (1974). Filosofía analítica. Buenos Aires: Sur, S. A.,.

Wittgenstein, L. (2008). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Madrid : TECNOS.

Published
2026-05-01
How to Cite
Largo Chacón, C. A. (2026). The work with logical fallacies and its influence on the development of analytical thinking in high school students. Philosophical Miscellany αρχή Electronic Magazine, 9(27), 22-55. https://doi.org/10.31644/mfarchere_v.9;n.27/26-A02
Issue
Vol 9 No 27 (2026): Miscelánea filosófica Número 27
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)