Publishing Process

The journal accepts submissions on an ongoing basis throughout the year, encouraging the continuous participation of researchers, faculty members, graduate and undergraduate students, and independent specialists from various academic institutions and national and international research centers. Miscelánea Filosófica: Electronic Journal publishes original and unpublished works in the fields of philosophy and related disciplines, particularly those linked to contemporary issues such as water, the environmental crisis, indigenous peoples, territory, human rights, gender-based violence, education, interculturality, and other topics related to philosophical and humanistic reflection. The journal defines philosophical research as any work oriented toward the critical, conceptual, historical, interpretive, or argumentative analysis of problems related to thought, culture, society, knowledge, and the human condition; it also includes interdisciplinary studies whose central focus retains a theoretical and reflective foundation characteristic of philosophy.

The journal accepts research articles, academic essays, translations, critical reviews, and original interdisciplinary studies, preferably written in Spanish; however, contributions in other languages of academic relevance may also be considered. It is also important to note that: THE JOURNAL DOES NOT ACCEPT CONTRIBUTIONS THAT ARE CURRENTLY UNDERGOING REVIEW BY OTHER PUBLICATIONS.

All submissions must include an abstract, keywords, and an abstract in Spanish and English (preferably), as well as an introduction, in order to enhance their visibility and international impact. Miscelánea Filosófica αρχή Revista Electrónica adopts the Open Access model, guaranteeing free, immediate, and unrestricted access to all its content, based on the principle that universal access to knowledge is a fundamental element for the scientific, humanistic, and cultural development of contemporary societies.

All submissions received will undergo a rigorous and transparent editorial process, which will first assess whether the proposals comply with editorial guidelines, and will then be evaluated academically by the Standing Committee of Reviewers using a double-blind peer review system, ensuring the anonymity of authors and reviewers at all times.

The reviewers will issue one of the following decisions: acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection. In cases where revisions are requested as a result of the evaluation process, authors must address the comments provided and submit the revised version within ten business days of receiving the relevant notification. Manuscripts that do not comply with the editorial guidelines and criteria established for publication will be rejected.